2. Admonishing child for calling his abuser "the movant" instead of "my father" under the assumption that child is being "disrespectful," and demanding that child addresses his abuser as his father because the court has not heard evidence of abuses from movant against child but only of how the movant loves and misses child and is doing everything he can to be reunited with child.
Perhaps the court needs to question its own assumptions when arriving at its conclusions and passing its judgments. When attorney for movant continuously objected to any potential testimony of abuses from child and the court continuously sustained the objections, how can evidences of emotional, psychological and physical abuses against child be entered on the records for the court to consider? Might there not been legitimate reasons why child refuses to address movant as his father? Among my online friends, the kids I know who call their parents by monikers other than "mom" and "dad" and "father" and "mother" are those who have been abused and are seeking ways to express their mockery and contempt of the person and situation they are in. I am not a kid who lacks respect, morals, ethics, manners, common sense, and logic; my mother, grandmother and uncle teach me well. I simply choose to call my abuser by what he is and not by a traditional title that he hasn't earned and fails to merit.
I do not know if there is a state law that requires minors to address their parents as "my mother" and "my father" but I can say that I will not be addressing The Jerk as my father any time soon, if ever. The language and words we use affect our frame of reference—this much I learned from my mother so that I am always careful about how I word my thoughts and feelings. I am being more than generous and conciliatory when I called my abuser "Mr. Lin." There is a certain standard and expectation I require from a father, and my abuser has never once fulfilled my needs of a father. In truth, he has negated everything great about fatherhood for me; because of my experience with him, I do not want to have children, my own or those of others. Why pass forward this essentially warped genetic materials of the Chang-Lin clan to an innocent? Even within myself, I am conscious of that other side of me that is fundamentally dishonest—my first instinct in almost all situation is to be lazy, take short cut, lie, cheat, steal and manipulate with the knowledge that I have what it takes to be successful at it—after all, my abuser has done it all his life and never once got caught by the systems that he has been gaming and the people that he has been conning. It is a struggle to constantly be on guard against those aspects of my character from taking over my mind and acting on what I know are wrongful and immoral intent. But staying conscious, I must. I don't want to live my life only to look backward with regrets for the things I have done. And being around my mother and grandmother and uncle helps; they anchor and steer me in the right direction.
Now, my mother, being a good and faithful person that she is, did explain that perhaps the court thought I had been intentionally "alienated" from The Jerk by her and her family. A clarification then: If I had been alienated from The Jerk, the fault lies with The Jerk himself for all those vicious words and explosive acts of abuses he had leveled against me throughout my childhood while publicly donning the role of devoted and caring father and spouting the principles and values that Confucius morality dictates in the conduct of life and of society. As I wrote before, neither my mother nor my grandmother nor my uncle wants anything to do with The Jerk. We don't talk about him unless I raise up the topic and even then, they smile politely and ask me questions so that I can arrive at my own conclusion and understanding. The fact that I refer to The Jerk as "the movant" came from conversations between my mother and grandmother where they used that term in reference to him. That and other legal terminologies such as "petitioner" and "respondent," depending on the motion, pleading or filing under their discussion.
Nos. 3 and 4 will be reposted here in the next few days.
Stay tune, and until next post,
We dream | We believe | And we will succeed
About this blog
Excepting this introduction and what are—and will be—posted after March 2015, this blog mirrored a now out-of-commission blog, http://ya-chang-lin.blogspot.com, which was taken down on October 21, 2013 by its author Phandeluys Truong.
The author's original contents and supporting documents were captured by multiple means from the above-mentioned blog while it was alive and active. There may have been a glitch here and there that prevented me from downloading the complete blog as it had existed. Thus, readers familiar with the original blog may find a few missing posts and/or comments. Those postings that I was able to grab and preserve in their entirety are reposted here under my name, however, all rights remain that of the original author.
This series of posts documents the fraudulent, sometimes criminal, and frequent unethical/immoral activities of Ya-Chang Robert Lin, a Taiwanese native of mainland Chinese parentage, who defrauded a naturalized US citizen, Phandeluys Truong, into a marriage that had been his shield against USCIS for his intentional violations of immigration law:
as a nonimmigrant F-1 student, he had willfully operated an international students recruiting business without prior work authorization from the then United States Immigration and Naturalization Service;
as President of said business, he had knowingly helped both mainland Chinese and Taiwanese students to evade military drafts in their countries by facilitating their applications to study in the US and abroad;
as President of said business, he had knowingly helped both mainland Chinese and Taiwanese students looking to enter the United States with the intention of gaining permanent US resident status under the pretense of studying;
as President of said business, he had purposely evaded paying taxes on the commissions received from it and failed to report the earned income to the IRS by having the payments wired back to Taiwan to his mother Chang Hsueh;
he had applied for reinstatement of his F-1 or student status and a change of status, while knowingly withheld the preceding facts on his own applications for permanent resident and citizenship in the United States.
And those are just the tip of the iceberg. Ya-Chang Robert Lin had been employed at AAFES or The Exchange headquarter in Dallas, Texas as an information technology auditor, where he managed to steal—by downloading to CDs that he kept in his personal possession while abiding for time and opportunities to "do business" in Taiwan and/or China—thousands of his colleagues’ Social Security numbers and personnel files while working on one of its HR projects. The HR data on one of these projects became the basis for an academic paper, speaking proposal for ISACA, and a consulting business he was "collaborating with " [more like conning other people into developing and fronting for him].
Ya-Chang Robert Lin is a reprobate with a seared conscience. Lacking normal capacity for empathy, remorse, and reciprocation of good will, he is addicted to lying, cheating, and stealing for the pure pleasures derived from being able to get away with it. Because he is such a good liar—so charming and well versed in manipulation techniques and acting skills—it is hard to distinguish him from reprobates.
Ya-Chang Robert Lin was able to dupe some of the smart people in federal government [AAFES or The Exchange, USCIS, ICE, and DHS], higher education [Fort Hays State University and Navarro College], and information technology auditing and security [ACFE and ISACA]. Among his legacy: A son who refused any connection with him and wished that he were dead.
Perhaps the court needs to question its own assumptions when arriving at its conclusions and passing its judgments. When attorney for movant continuously objected to any potential testimony of abuses from child and the court continuously sustained the objections, how can evidences of emotional, psychological and physical abuses against child be entered on the records for the court to consider? Might there not been legitimate reasons why child refuses to address movant as his father? Among my online friends, the kids I know who call their parents by monikers other than "mom" and "dad" and "father" and "mother" are those who have been abused and are seeking ways to express their mockery and contempt of the person and situation they are in. I am not a kid who lacks respect, morals, ethics, manners, common sense, and logic; my mother, grandmother and uncle teach me well. I simply choose to call my abuser by what he is and not by a traditional title that he hasn't earned and fails to merit.
I do not know if there is a state law that requires minors to address their parents as "my mother" and "my father" but I can say that I will not be addressing The Jerk as my father any time soon, if ever. The language and words we use affect our frame of reference—this much I learned from my mother so that I am always careful about how I word my thoughts and feelings. I am being more than generous and conciliatory when I called my abuser "Mr. Lin." There is a certain standard and expectation I require from a father, and my abuser has never once fulfilled my needs of a father. In truth, he has negated everything great about fatherhood for me; because of my experience with him, I do not want to have children, my own or those of others. Why pass forward this essentially warped genetic materials of the Chang-Lin clan to an innocent? Even within myself, I am conscious of that other side of me that is fundamentally dishonest—my first instinct in almost all situation is to be lazy, take short cut, lie, cheat, steal and manipulate with the knowledge that I have what it takes to be successful at it—after all, my abuser has done it all his life and never once got caught by the systems that he has been gaming and the people that he has been conning. It is a struggle to constantly be on guard against those aspects of my character from taking over my mind and acting on what I know are wrongful and immoral intent. But staying conscious, I must. I don't want to live my life only to look backward with regrets for the things I have done. And being around my mother and grandmother and uncle helps; they anchor and steer me in the right direction.
Now, my mother, being a good and faithful person that she is, did explain that perhaps the court thought I had been intentionally "alienated" from The Jerk by her and her family. A clarification then: If I had been alienated from The Jerk, the fault lies with The Jerk himself for all those vicious words and explosive acts of abuses he had leveled against me throughout my childhood while publicly donning the role of devoted and caring father and spouting the principles and values that Confucius morality dictates in the conduct of life and of society. As I wrote before, neither my mother nor my grandmother nor my uncle wants anything to do with The Jerk. We don't talk about him unless I raise up the topic and even then, they smile politely and ask me questions so that I can arrive at my own conclusion and understanding. The fact that I refer to The Jerk as "the movant" came from conversations between my mother and grandmother where they used that term in reference to him. That and other legal terminologies such as "petitioner" and "respondent," depending on the motion, pleading or filing under their discussion.
Nos. 3 and 4 will be reposted here in the next few days.
Stay tune, and until next post,
We dream | We believe | And we will succeed
About this blog
Excepting this introduction and what are—and will be—posted after March 2015, this blog mirrored a now out-of-commission blog, http://ya-chang-lin.blogspot.com, which was taken down on October 21, 2013 by its author Phandeluys Truong.
The author's original contents and supporting documents were captured by multiple means from the above-mentioned blog while it was alive and active. There may have been a glitch here and there that prevented me from downloading the complete blog as it had existed. Thus, readers familiar with the original blog may find a few missing posts and/or comments. Those postings that I was able to grab and preserve in their entirety are reposted here under my name, however, all rights remain that of the original author.
This series of posts documents the fraudulent, sometimes criminal, and frequent unethical/immoral activities of Ya-Chang Robert Lin, a Taiwanese native of mainland Chinese parentage, who defrauded a naturalized US citizen, Phandeluys Truong, into a marriage that had been his shield against USCIS for his intentional violations of immigration law:
as a nonimmigrant F-1 student, he had willfully operated an international students recruiting business without prior work authorization from the then United States Immigration and Naturalization Service;
as President of said business, he had knowingly helped both mainland Chinese and Taiwanese students to evade military drafts in their countries by facilitating their applications to study in the US and abroad;
as President of said business, he had knowingly helped both mainland Chinese and Taiwanese students looking to enter the United States with the intention of gaining permanent US resident status under the pretense of studying;
as President of said business, he had purposely evaded paying taxes on the commissions received from it and failed to report the earned income to the IRS by having the payments wired back to Taiwan to his mother Chang Hsueh;
he had applied for reinstatement of his F-1 or student status and a change of status, while knowingly withheld the preceding facts on his own applications for permanent resident and citizenship in the United States.
And those are just the tip of the iceberg. Ya-Chang Robert Lin had been employed at AAFES or The Exchange headquarter in Dallas, Texas as an information technology auditor, where he managed to steal—by downloading to CDs that he kept in his personal possession while abiding for time and opportunities to "do business" in Taiwan and/or China—thousands of his colleagues’ Social Security numbers and personnel files while working on one of its HR projects. The HR data on one of these projects became the basis for an academic paper, speaking proposal for ISACA, and a consulting business he was "collaborating with " [more like conning other people into developing and fronting for him].
Ya-Chang Robert Lin is a reprobate with a seared conscience. Lacking normal capacity for empathy, remorse, and reciprocation of good will, he is addicted to lying, cheating, and stealing for the pure pleasures derived from being able to get away with it. Because he is such a good liar—so charming and well versed in manipulation techniques and acting skills—it is hard to distinguish him from reprobates.
Ya-Chang Robert Lin was able to dupe some of the smart people in federal government [AAFES or The Exchange, USCIS, ICE, and DHS], higher education [Fort Hays State University and Navarro College], and information technology auditing and security [ACFE and ISACA]. Among his legacy: A son who refused any connection with him and wished that he were dead.
No comments:
Post a Comment