Monday, January 14, 2013

A convenient marriage

Jan 07 3:15 PM
Phandeluys A. Truong:You want the divorce yet don't planned for it financially? What's that supposed to be? A sand-castle of an idea on an incoming wave?
 

Jan 07 3:20 PM
12146367393:You want the divorce for a long time. I have been pay check to pay check to support the family, no extra money at this moment.
 

Jan 07 3:28 PM
Phandeluys A. Truong:Really? You mean you don't want the fallout resulting from the divorce nor to pay for it, but you've been squirreling money and other resources for your sideline single's life, right? Okay, two can play the same game. Am still marry but will live the single's lifestyle, too.
 

Jan 07 3:35 PM
Phandeluys A. Truong:So, you're telling me you'll have no money to respond to my agency's filing for civil and criminal charges against you? Not even as a respondent to an at-fault divorce filing? Because if you're lying now about the finances, we'll sue for misleading by disinformation. Just so you know.
 

Jan 07 3:45 PM
Phandeluys A. Truong:My legal reps and I myself want to hear what it is that you do want from this marriage? Are you or are you not hankering for a divorce? Willing to pay for it and suffer the consequences, yes or no, if you do also want the divorce? Simple question, really: Do you or do you not want the divorce? Or are there mitigating circumstances?
 

Jan 07 3:47 PM
Phandeluys A. Truong:I have to go, pick up my car, then D at school.
 

Jan 07 4:36 PM
Phandeluys A. Truong:Yes or no. Are you in agreement with the divorce? That means you, too, want the divorce, right? Wouldn't want you coming back telling D and everyone else something different--like not contributing anything to this marriage. ...
 

Jan 07 4:44 PM
12146367393:I am sick and skip lunch to get you tag as well D lunch. If you have nothing nice to say, I would like to get my first meal of the day.
 

Jan 07 5:22 PM
Phandeluys A. Truong:I asked a very simple question that requires only a Yes or No from you. It's got nothing to do with niceties. Yes, you're in agreement about the divorce; or No, you're not in agreement about the divorce. Is that plain and clear enough for you to answer? Have a good late lunch-dinner.
 

Jan 07 5:37 PM
12146367393:Ask yourself what you have done. I am a homeless but paying for all your home expenses. You are tricky.
 

Jan 07 7:37 PM
Phandeluys A. Truong:I am tricky or you are dishonest, deceiving, manipulative, and a user? You're still not answering my question: Are you in agreement with divorce, yes or no. Or you're biding your time? There's no statute of limitation concerning the things you've engaged in, so you can try and buy all the time you want. There's always two party in any relationship. I know why I want a divorce; do you want a divorce, and why? Do you know? If we each are clear on the agreement and why, there's no hesitation, then.
 

Jan 07 7:39 PM
12146367393:Why ask me? Your actions should be your decision.
 

Jan 07 7:42 PM
Phandeluys A. Truong:About paying for all, you should since you robbed me of 16 years of productive work in my professional career and life, a sacrifice I made per your deception for the family you claimed to have wanted but in reality was just for your permanent residency because you fucked up your F-1 student status for getting all Incompletes in your graduate studies in 1995. Why else would you have been in hurry to dump your live-in girlfriend Ming-Jung Li when you had just sponsored her for your American Express card, and she you on {her} Discover card? 


My spouse and I met in February 1996 at a Chinese New Year's Party; we eloped in June 1996 ...




































Jan 07 7:44 PM
Phandeluys A. Truong:Why ask you? Because there are two people in any relationship; there's also D. I wouldn't want D to "blame" the divorce on me, the way you told D I contributed nothing to this marriage during the past 16 years. Have to defend myself against your cheats, lies, crocodile tears, empty words and more pony-show actions. ... That's why.


Jan 07 7:47 PM
Phandeluys A. Truong:If I consider my actions [along with my reps' counsel], I'd say no divorce but other alternatives for you and yours. We'll see which route is worst.
 

Jan 07 7:55 PM
Phandeluys A. Truong:Keep an eye on my blog, where I'll post more information that have been cleared by the agencies ... Perhaps, both readers from Taiwan and China will find all my postings quite normal, considering your people are users and money-worshippers in the extreme. You have a warm and soulful night.
 

Jan 07 7:59 PM
Phandeluys A. Truong:Thanks for the laughter
 

Jan 07 8:03 PM
Phandeluys A. Truong:... someone as manipulative and foxy as you and yours calling me "tricky." That says quite a bit about your [lack of] street-smart education or I have learned a lot [via osmosis] by being around you ... Either way, thanks for the [degrading] compliment, even though that's the very last words I'd ever want to hear [or read].
 

Jan 07 9:22 PM
12146367393:Never had a problem with my F-1 visa. Was a P{h}D student with full scholarship when I met you. Your blog is {in}tend{ed} to be a slander to intimidate me to file the divorce. Only for a very limited time you might have contributed to our relationship, mostly is only for your own goal while spending most of our resources.
 

Jan 07 11:16 PM
Phandeluys A. Truong:My blog is to expose the real you and yours. Intimidate someone like you? Only when you and yours have done illegal things here in the United States and back in your countries of origin [Taiwan and China both]. Sorry, but according to immigration officers, your F-1 status was in jeopardy--that much we confirmed. And that was the reason for dumping your ex and getting hitched. That's the conclusion from the agency, not me, but I am in agreement. Whether and how much I contributed will be up to the legal system to decide, not you, which is too bad for you and yours. Keep living in your deluded world; it'll get knocked off with a major bang one of these days, when you least expected. Then, it'll be my turn. And even though I am cleared by the agencies to publish whatever docs concerning you and yours, I'll wait until we {get} you in front of Immigration Court, Family Court, and Criminal Court. An element of surprise never hurts {against someone as unscrupulous as you and yours}. ... Sweet and soulful dreaming.


No comments:

Post a Comment